|
|
Post by pitbulllady on Dec 27, 2005 10:21:53 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by fairlyoddnewyorker on Dec 27, 2005 11:13:29 GMT -5
This sucks. Everyone knows Disney can't write a good sequel to save their butts!  Sure, one out of every five sequels is acceptable ... but they can never capture what the previous film had. Pixar made only one sequel, and that's the best Disney sequel ever! |
|
yoruhoshi
Randall's Head Servant (300-799)
The Lady Black Mage
Posts: 496
|
Post by yoruhoshi on Dec 27, 2005 13:17:03 GMT -5
I agree with FONY. Most of the sequels made by Disney don't seem to hold the magic that the original film had.
|
|
|
|
Post by pitbulllady on Dec 27, 2005 17:17:35 GMT -5
On a slightly more positive note, though, according to Animated-news.com, Pixar execs will probably have access to the Circle 7 studio, where Disney is making the sequels, which means that they will very likely have creative input, if not be allowed to actually work on the sequels themselves. While Disney will retain the rights to the characters, etc., Pixar could still have a lot more impact, so those sequels would basically be a collaboration between the two.
pitbulllady
|
|
|
|
Post by lizardgirl on Dec 28, 2005 9:43:35 GMT -5
Not only tha fact that Disney has a lot of control over MI2, but even the general idea of a Toy Story 3 is making me cringe. Toy Story was great, as was its sequel, but really, a THIRD one? *shakes head*
|
|
Beboots
Randall's Head Servant (300-799)
Now, if you'll excuse me, there's a plague in Equatorial Guinea that I have to attend.
Posts: 646
|
Post by Beboots on Dec 28, 2005 12:55:01 GMT -5
Not only tha fact that Disney has a lot of control over MI2, but even the general idea of a Toy Story 3 is making me cringe. Toy Story was great, as was its sequel, but really, a THIRD one? *shakes head* I agree- is it really neccessary to milk the thing a third time, and risk having the fans turn on you? There's only so much you can say on a subject before becoming redundant. |
|
|
|
Post by lizardgirl on Dec 30, 2005 8:37:02 GMT -5
Exactly. I don't understand how Disney can even consider the idea, other than to make a few extra bucks.
|
|
|
|
Post by RandallBoggs on Jan 5, 2006 15:48:52 GMT -5
Personally the fate of M.I. 2 now lies on Disney's production of Toy Story 3. If it does well (Physically AND Emotionally), then that's good...
Then again, we can't really predict much...
We know Randall's gonna be in the sequel in some way, though most likely they'd ruin things AGAIN for him.
|
|
|
|
Post by lizardgirl on Jan 6, 2006 11:28:43 GMT -5
Let's just hope they have the common sense to change Randall's fate...
|
|
|
|
Post by RandallBoggs on Jan 6, 2006 14:57:01 GMT -5
Heh...yeah right...
|
|
Sure, one out of every five sequels is acceptable ... but they can never capture what the previous film had. Pixar made only one sequel, and that's the best Disney sequel ever! 
