|
|
Post by pitbulllady on Feb 7, 2006 6:45:17 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by RandallBoggs on Feb 7, 2006 16:14:44 GMT -5
I haven't read the article yet since you gave the gist (thanks ^_^)
But this seems good. This means that they would get in sequels for many of the films. And if they're going into chronological order at 2-1, it'll be quick for M.I. 2 to come out.
|
|
Veg
Randall's Friend (800-1999)
Posts: 1,550
|
Post by Veg on Feb 7, 2006 18:02:42 GMT -5
Oh good! I'll be hoping!
|
|
|
|
Post by vladimirgg on Feb 7, 2006 23:06:47 GMT -5
While I'm excited by the increased production, I'm a little apprehensive about a Toy Story 3.....
|
|
babyrandall
Randall's Head Servant (300-799)
Well What do you Know It scaers little kids and little monsters!
Posts: 470
|
Post by babyrandall on Feb 8, 2006 12:49:45 GMT -5
oh I Hope really soon for MI 2! and it's also really cool that their make a Toy Story 3 I wounder what the story plot is this time!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by RandallBoggs on Feb 8, 2006 15:30:42 GMT -5
The plot has something to do about the guys eventually ending up at a daycare or something like that...
|
|
babyrandall
Randall's Head Servant (300-799)
Well What do you Know It scaers little kids and little monsters!
Posts: 470
|
Post by babyrandall on Feb 8, 2006 16:10:32 GMT -5
Ahh! Cool!
|
|
|
|
Post by RandallBoggs on Feb 8, 2006 16:16:08 GMT -5
I hear it somewhere...
Hey VJ? How are things? Haven't heard an E-mail from you in a while.
|
|
yoruhoshi
Randall's Head Servant (300-799)
The Lady Black Mage
Posts: 496
|
Post by yoruhoshi on Feb 8, 2006 19:37:56 GMT -5
oh I Hope really soon for MI 2! Ditto here!! ^.^ And at any rate I wish they will bring Randall back, even if they don't show that he isn't a bad guy. |
|
|
|
Post by RandallBoggs on Feb 9, 2006 14:00:40 GMT -5
it really depends it they're listening.
|
|
|
|
Post by pitbulllady on Feb 9, 2006 20:06:00 GMT -5
oh I Hope really soon for MI 2! Ditto here!! ^.^ And at any rate I wish they will bring Randall back, even if they don't show that he isn't a bad guy. As much as I love Randall, I would rather never see him in a movie again, than to see him once more portrayed as some "evil" villain, who is ultimately made a fool of, and who ultimately "gets his just desserts" at the hands of Mike and Sulley. He's been through more than enough already, and got worse than he deserved. To see him dragged through the proverbial mud, yet again, would turn me against going to see another Pixar movie, EVER. Either they can give him a chance to redeem himself, to honestly EARN respect that's he'd always wanted, or they can leave him out of the sequel. I'm not into "evil" or "darkness"; I went through a very mild phase when I was in college, but thankfully, I grew up. Every run-of-the-mill Saturday morning kiddie cartoon features some nasty Bad Guy(or Gal)who is constantly being made a fool of, or getting beaten by, the "Good Guys". *YAWN*. It would be far more original, and far more positive, for a movie to feature a well-developed character arc, in which the "Bad Guy" is able to defeat the evil within HIMSELF, rather than just get beat up by the "Good Guy". So far, "Lilo and Stitch" is the only animated movie, connected to Disney anyway, in which this was shown, and it changed my outlook on the whole "good vs. evil" thing forever. Stitch was CREATED to be evil and violent and destructive, yet HE overcame that aspect of himself, so surely Randall can be shown in that same light, and the movie still be believable. pitbulllady |
|
|
|
Post by vladimirgg on Feb 10, 2006 13:27:56 GMT -5
Ditto here!! ^.^ And at any rate I wish they will bring Randall back, even if they don't show that he isn't a bad guy. As much as I love Randall, I would rather never see him in a movie again, than to see him once more portrayed as some "evil" villain, who is ultimately made a fool of, and who ultimately "gets his just desserts" at the hands of Mike and Sulley. He's been through more than enough already, and got worse than he deserved. To see him dragged through the proverbial mud, yet again, would turn me against going to see another Pixar movie, EVER. Either they can give him a chance to redeem himself, to honestly EARN respect that's he'd always wanted, or they can leave him out of the sequel. I'm not into "evil" or "darkness"; I went through a very mild phase when I was in college, but thankfully, I grew up. Every run-of-the-mill Saturday morning kiddie cartoon features some nasty Bad Guy(or Gal)who is constantly being made a fool of, or getting beaten by, the "Good Guys". *YAWN*. It would be far more original, and far more positive, for a movie to feature a well-developed character arc, in which the "Bad Guy" is able to defeat the evil within HIMSELF, rather than just get beat up by the "Good Guy". So far, "Lilo and Stitch" is the only animated movie, connected to Disney anyway, in which this was shown, and it changed my outlook on the whole "good vs. evil" thing forever. Stitch was CREATED to be evil and violent and destructive, yet HE overcame that aspect of himself, so surely Randall can be shown in that same light, and the movie still be believable. pitbulllady I agree, I would love to see Randall in the sequel (I'm cetain there will be one, MI was to succesfull NOT to have one and this is Disney we're talking about here  ) but I would hate for them to potray him as the uber villain of doom again.... though considering the fact that he got nothing but negative attention in the movie, reviews and media I have very little doubt that that is just what will happen  |
|
|
|
Post by RandallBoggs on Feb 10, 2006 14:50:54 GMT -5
Well you all better change your opinions because Randall IS going to be in M.I. 2. It just isn't right without him.
|
|
|
|
Post by vladimirgg on Feb 10, 2006 15:22:06 GMT -5
I never said he wouldn't be in MI2. My opinion will stand firm thanks..... yes there is a selfish side of me that wants him to be in the sequel regardless of how crappily he will be treated... of course, that side of me will ultimately be tied up, gagged and thrown into the depths of my subcontious |
|
|
|
Post by RandallBoggs on Feb 10, 2006 15:24:57 GMT -5
?
|
|
) but I would hate for them to potray him as the uber villain of doom again.... though considering the fact that he got nothing but negative attention in the movie, reviews and media I have very little doubt that that is just what will happen 