|
Post by Theophilus Hatta on Jun 6, 2010 20:42:45 GMT -5
Yeah, actually, in a kind of noir-ish past I can see it... but then... my... with the sagging- to the present- and... ewwwwwww. DX
|
|
Bampot
Randall's Friend (800-1999)
<3
Posts: 1,204
|
Post by Bampot on Jun 8, 2010 18:34:11 GMT -5
Yeah, actually, in a kind of noir-ish past I can see it... but then... my... with the sagging- to the present- and... ewwwwwww. DX What has been seen...
|
|
|
Post by Theophilus Hatta on Jun 9, 2010 12:24:25 GMT -5
... requires massive amounts of cleaning product applied directly to the brain.
|
|
Bampot
Randall's Friend (800-1999)
<3
Posts: 1,204
|
Post by Bampot on Jun 9, 2010 14:54:41 GMT -5
... requires massive amounts of cleaning product applied directly to the brain. Lol, Brain-On XD I think I'd need a bucket of it.
|
|
Leopardstream
Randall's Skivvy (0-299)
No one wants cake? OKAY! *shoves cake in mouth*
Posts: 261
|
Post by Leopardstream on Aug 4, 2010 19:49:12 GMT -5
What the crap?! Wall-e smut?! Cars smut?! They can't even DO half of what everyone ELSE can do!!! I'm very angry at these stupid fools who go around. Luckily, there is no Toy Story.... Oh Lord, what if there is?!
|
|
|
Post by sgtyayap on Aug 4, 2010 19:52:55 GMT -5
Alas, there probably is. The Internet has constantly proven that there's explicit sex stuff everywhere. In fact, one time, I DID notice a YouTube video (which, fortunately, I didn't watch) titled "Toys Gone Wild"!
|
|
|
Post by mistica0christina on Aug 4, 2010 20:01:32 GMT -5
The great expression is this, if it's popular and has a humongous fandom to boot then there's probably porno of it online. Welcome to the internet.
|
|
Bampot
Randall's Friend (800-1999)
<3
Posts: 1,204
|
Post by Bampot on Aug 4, 2010 20:19:55 GMT -5
What the crap?! Wall-e smut?! Cars smut?! They can't even DO half of what everyone ELSE can do!!! I'm very angry at these stupid fools who go around. Luckily, there is no Toy Story.... Oh Lord, what if there is?! Considering Rule 34 and the fact that I just did a Google search...yes. Yes there is. No Pixar is safe. Especially The Incredibles.
|
|
|
Post by pitbulllady on Aug 4, 2010 22:32:41 GMT -5
I've already seen WoodyxBuzz slash porn on DA, so yeah, it exists. I've come across MI porn as well, also slash, also on DA. I don't think any character or Pixar film is safe from it.
pitbulllady
|
|
|
Post by mistica0christina on Aug 4, 2010 22:41:56 GMT -5
Well, almost anything could have slash in it...but how it's rendered can sometimes make it seem okay or just plain sick. Now, if I see something innocent such as characters hugging, just hanging out, maybe a simple kiss...I'm not bothered by it but that's just me personally....now the stuff that looks like actual X rated porno, that's what scares me...that's the stuff that basically creates smut on the internet..but yeah, as long as you got people who get off on looking at cartoons doing adult stuff strictly then yeah, you will have smut.
|
|
Leopardstream
Randall's Skivvy (0-299)
No one wants cake? OKAY! *shoves cake in mouth*
Posts: 261
|
Post by Leopardstream on Aug 4, 2010 22:52:45 GMT -5
Qoute "I even saw a youtube video called "Toys Gone wild!"
Well, that is a Youtube Poop, and it IS very sexual. WHAT IS UP WITH THE WORLD?! *Starts singing* ITS DAH END OF THE WORLD AS WE KNOW IT! ITS DAH END OF THE WORLD AS WE KNOW IT! AND I FEEL LIKE CRAP!
|
|
|
Post by mentalguru on Aug 5, 2010 3:21:41 GMT -5
Well I personally have little problem with slash in of itself really, I mean I mostly ship things based on the fact I think they have strong mental connections and if their sexuality seems realistici or vague enough to work. Have them be awesome friends and it seem realistic and there's a possibility I'll like it.
(And people who think that two guys or two girls kissing needs a higher rating than a girl or guy doing the exact same thing are silly at best).
I'm mostly weirded out by Cars because... it just doesn't seem possible and I don't get it (and I'm thinking there is a lot of references to mufflers and what not in my morbid imagination), slash in general seems strange but then in GENERAL anything sexual to do with Cars seems strange, I mean how the heck is gender even differentiated? It's why while I liked the plot I failed to get into Cars, the world just didn't make sense to me.
WALL-E porn would just seem absolutely wrong, even disregarding the fact it's not possible... WALL-E is too innocent and cute like that and after 700 years he's not going to grow up or change in that regard at all.
When it comes to Toy Story I've mostly seen human AUs and TBH I don't mind BuzzXWoody that much, I don't actively ship it mind you. Though actual toy porn would be odd. I mean... I can get weird feelings and them feeling confused about liking someone other than the norm and things like that (and kisses and stuff) but you can't exactly have porn with toys.
Well you technically CAN but that's something completely different and- OH GOD STAY AWAY FROM GOOGLE!
....
In any case porn happens, it's I think in general simply that Cars porn is exceedingly baffling and doesn't make sense to me rather like with in-universe Toy Story porn and WALL-E just seems horrifically wrong on so many levels.
I'm not surprised there is Monsters Inc porn out there either. I'm actually surprised at the lack of it.
And yes The Incredibles seems to be the most used which makes sense, I've less issues with that except... incest seems to be unfortunatly common from the little I've stumbled on.
(Poor Violet is all I can say).
But The Incredibles family does not seem to be THAT kind of family. The Fire Nation royal family in Avatar maybe (they are SEVERELY messed up as it is) but geez.
|
|
|
Post by pitbulllady on Aug 5, 2010 11:44:44 GMT -5
Yeah, now that you mention it, I AM surprised at the scarcity of MI porn, either in fan art or fanfiction, especially given that many of Randall's fans are drawn to that character, at least in part, because they find him sexually attractive. There's not even many "lemon" or "lime" fics featuring him. I guess it says something about Randall's fans being of a somewhat higher calibre than many character's fans, and even those who do find him quite attractive are also drawn to him for many more qualities, so he's not just a "sex object".
pitbulllady
|
|
|
Post by goldenponcho on Apr 2, 2013 14:45:56 GMT -5
Sorry for reviving a really old thread, but I just wondered if there IS anyone here that is interested in rule 34. To be honest, I love it. Sure there are limitations on what I actually like, but it takes a lot to really squick me, and to be honest, I'm all for smut of characters I like. I only think it really gets out of hand when that's all you see of a certain character. I think a little mixture of thought provoking discussion/art, fluff, smut, whatever else have you is a good thing.
|
|
|
Post by mintygreen on Apr 2, 2013 20:06:31 GMT -5
I only just noticed this thread now. lol. I guess because it just got a new post....never looked in this thread before.
Anyway, I've been around the internet for long enough(since I was about 14 and I'm 28 now) that nothing really surprises me anymore.
If people want to write smut about characters from Cars, I don't care. I mean the characters in Cars do nothing for me in that kind of way what so ever but at the same time, I don't see anything wrong with it.
I tend to be pretty accepting and tolerant of whatever people are into as long as it's not something illegal/seriously just wrong.
I remember seeing a program once about people who are attracted to inanimate objects such as cars(there was a guy who considers himself to be in a relationship with his car). Yeah, it's odd.....but it's not like it's hurting anyone.
Personally, I'm attracted to Randall, although have never been attracted to real life things that somewhat resemble him(like lizards for example). They don't have the humanizing qualities that Randall has. I don't know what it is about Randall exactly but it's very different. I've never been remotely attracted to any real life animals. Not in the least.
I don't even consider myself to be a part of the furry fandom because there are only a few characters that I like that could potentially fall into that realm.
As for Randall smut though....hey I wouldn't mind seeing that sometimes. If you find a character attractive, generally you're probably at least SOMEWHAT interested in seeing something like that once in a while.
I mean, personally I do prefer to combine those kinds of fantasies/ideas with something romantic though. And any characters that I'm attracted to, I always like them beyond simply finding them sexually attractive.
I think I drew 1 or 2 smut pictures myself back in the day(not of Randall, I can't remember what characters it was....I don't think it was Pixar characters). I pretty much just kept them to myself though and eventually just threw them out because I was afraid of a family member finding it or something because it would just be awkward and they probably wouldn't understand. LOL.
I mean, I think it's normal though for most people to like this kind of stuff to some degree if they have any kind of physical attraction to any characters.
|
|